Search Page
Save citations to file
Email citations
Send citations to clipboard
Add to Collections
Add to My Bibliography
Create a file for external citation management software
Your saved search
Your RSS Feed
Filters
Results by year
Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.
Year | Number of Results |
---|---|
2023 | 1 |
2024 | 2 |
Search Results
2 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Dental age assessment in the living: a comparison of two common stage classifications for assessing radiographic visibility of the root canals in mandibular third molars.
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Mar;138(2):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03121-y. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
Int J Legal Med. 2024.
PMID: 37952073
Free PMC article.
Correlation between age and stage was higher with the Olze method (Spearman rho 0.388 [95% CI 0.309, 0.462], males and 0.283 [95% CI 0.216, 0.357], females) than the Lucas method (0.212 [95% CI 0.141, 0.284], males and 0.265 [95% CI 0.193, 0.340], females). ...The method o …
Correlation between age and stage was higher with the Olze method (Spearman rho 0.388 [95% CI 0.309, 0.462], males and 0.283 [95% CI 0.216, …
Radiological assessment of periodontal ligament space visibility on third molars for forensic age assessment - a comparison study of three different staging scales.
Timme M, Steffens L, Viktorov J, Streeter A, Karch A, Schmeling A.
Timme M, et al.
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Feb 17. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03184-5. Online ahead of print.
Int J Legal Med. 2024.
PMID: 38367027
We directly compared the 2010 staging scale proposed by Olze et al. with the 2017 staging by Lucas et al. and the 2020 staging by Guo et al. in a German study population. ...In summary, we showed that the staging scales of Olze et al. and Lucas et al. were very simi …
We directly compared the 2010 staging scale proposed by Olze et al. with the 2017 staging by Lucas et al. and the 2020 staging by Guo …
Item in Clipboard
Cite
Cite