Current status of proton pump inhibitor use in Japanese elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A subanalysis of the ANAFIE Registry

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0240859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240859. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The real-world status of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving antithrombotic treatment is largely unknown. The All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study, aimed to determine treatment patterns, risk factors, and outcomes among elderly (aged ≥75 years) Japanese non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients in the real-world clinical setting. The present subanalysis of the ANAFIE Registry determined the PPI prescription status of 32,490 elderly Japanese NVAF patients. Patients were stratified by PPI use (PPI+) or no PPI use (PPI-). Risk scores for stroke (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc) and bleeding (HAS-BLED), anticoagulant use, time in therapeutic range (TTR) for warfarin, and anticoagulant/antiplatelet combination use were evaluated. PPIs were used in 11,981 (36.9%) patients. Compared with the PPI- group, the PPI+ group included a greater proportion of female patients (45.2% vs 41.3%; P <0.0001) and had significantly higher CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores (P <0.0001 for each) as well as higher prevalences of several comorbidities. In the PPI+ group, 54.6% of patients did not have gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and were likely prescribed a PPI to prevent GI bleeding events. Most of the patients with a GI disorder in the PPI+ group had reflux esophagitis. Compared with patients not receiving anticoagulants, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving anticoagulants received PPIs. For patients receiving anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, and both drugs, rates of PPI use were 34.1%, 44.1%, and 53.5%, respectively (P <0.01). Although the rate of PPI use was the highest for NVAF patients receiving both antiplatelet and anticoagulants, no clear differences were observed in the anticoagulants used. These data suggest that PPIs were actively prescribed in high-risk cases and may have been used to prevent GI bleeding among elderly NVAF patients receiving antithrombotic drugs. Trial registration: UMIN000024006.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anticoagulants / administration & dosage
  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / drug therapy*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / epidemiology
  • Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Hemorrhage / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Japan / epidemiology
  • Male
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / administration & dosage
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Prospective Studies
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors / administration & dosage
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Registries
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke / epidemiology
  • Stroke / etiology
  • Stroke / prevention & control

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors

Associated data

  • UMIN-CTR/UMIN000024006

Grants and funding

This study was supported by Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, in the form of salaries for authors Tetsuya Kimura, Jumpei Kaburagi, and Atsushi Takita. Yuji Mizokami received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, and remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo. Takatsugu Yamamoto received remuneration from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and AstraZeneca. Hirotsugu Atarashi received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo. Takeshi Yamashita received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo, manuscript fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer Japan, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Masaharu Akao received research funding from Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo, and remuneration from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo. Takanori Ikeda received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo and Bayer, and remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Yukihiro Koretsune received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Ken Okumura received remuneration from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic. Wataru Shimizu received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and patent royalties/licensing fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Hiroyuki Tsutsui received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer Japan, scholarship funding from Daiichi Sankyo, and consultancy fees from Pfizer Japan, Bayer, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Kazunori Toyoda received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Atsushi Hirayama received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo and Bayer, and remuneration from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Masahiro Yasaka received research funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and remuneration from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer Japan. Takenori Yamaguchi received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Satoshi Teramukai received research funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo. Hiroshi Inoue received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.