Is Policy the Necessary or Sufficient Driving Force of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry Development? Experience from China

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064936.

Abstract

Policies have long been considered the essential driving force in promoting construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling. However, the policy instruments adopted in different economies have varied greatly, which contributes to the difficulty in quantitative discernment of their effect. This study aims to examine whether the holistic employment of policy measures determines the development of CDW recycling around China. To accurately measure the holistic adoption of CDW policies, this study assessed policy strength via a proposed three-dimensional evaluation model. The spatiotemporal differences in policy strength among the 52 sample cities were further defined using K-means clustering and the Gini coefficient. Next, the driving effect of policy on the initial establishment of CDW recycling industry practices was examined by event history analysis (EHA). Finally, fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was used to analyze the sufficiency and necessity of policy for the initial establishment of CDW recycling practices. The results indicated that the establishment of a first CDW recycling plant is only slightly correlated with policy measures, whereas it is highly correlated with the pilot city and per capita GDP. Furthermore, application of policy is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for the establishment of a CDW recycling industry facility.

Keywords: construction and demolition waste (CDW); event history analysis (EHA); fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA); policy strength; recycling industry.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • China
  • Cities
  • Construction Industry* / methods
  • Construction Materials / analysis
  • Industrial Waste / analysis
  • Recycling / methods
  • Waste Management* / methods

Substances

  • Industrial Waste

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China, grant number 22BGL194.