Aims: We aim to determine the optimal dose of dabigatran in Korean patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods and results: We analysed 1834 patients with non-valvular AF, classified into a warfarin group (n = 990), dabigatran 150 mg group (D150, n = 294), and 110 mg group (D110, n = 550). The D110 group was further classified into patients concordant (co-D110, n = 367) and patients discordant (di-D110, n = 183) with guidelines to dose reduction. Propensity-matched 1-year clinical outcomes were then compared. Efficacy outcomes were defined as thromboembolism composed of new-onset stroke or systemic embolism. Safety outcomes were major bleeding. Both D150 and D110 had comparable efficacies as warfarin. However, only D110 significantly lowered the risk of major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.55, P = 0.002]. In a subgroup analysis according to guideline-concordant indications for dose reduction, both co-D110 and di-D110 displayed a comparable efficacy as warfarin. Both co-D110 (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.76, P = 0.017) and di-D110 (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.81, P = 0.030) significantly lowered incidences of major bleeding. There were no differences in the efficacy and safety between di-D110 and D150, and net clinical outcomes were similar.
Conclusion: Although D150 and D110 had a comparable efficacy, only D110 lowered the risk of major bleeding in Korean AF patients compared with warfarin. Even the guideline-discordant use of dabigatran 110 mg demonstrated a similar efficacy and safety compared with D150. However, further prospective randomized trials are needed in order to comprehensively evaluate whether D150 or D110 is the optimal dosage in Asian patients with AF.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Bleeding; Dabigatran; Safety; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.