Validating the Methods to Process the Stress Path in Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criteria

Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 4;14(1):206. doi: 10.3390/ma14010206.

Abstract

The paper discusses one of the key features in the multiaxial fatigue strength evaluation-the procedure in which the stress path is analyzed to provide relevant measures of parameters required by multiaxial criteria. The selection of this procedure affects the complete equivalent stress derived for any multiaxial load combinations. Three major concepts-the minimum circumscribed circle, minimum circumscribed ellipse, and moment of inertia methods-are described. Analytical solutions of their evaluation for multiaxial stress state with components described by harmonic functions are provided. The concepts are validated on available experimental data when included into six different multiaxial fatigue strength criteria. The results show that the moment of inertia results in too conservative results. Differences between both methods of circumscribed entities are much smaller. There are indications however that the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution works better for critical plane criteria and for the criteria based on stress tensor transformation into the Ilyushin deviatoric space. On the other hand, the minimum circumscribed ellipse solution tends to shift integral criteria to the conservative side.

Keywords: maximum prismatic hull; minimum circumscribed circle method; minimum circumscribed ellipse method; moment of inertia method; multiaxial fatigue; shear stress path.