People do not have high levels of knowledge of low dose ionizing radiation (LDIR)

J Environ Radioact. 2024 Jan:271:107311. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107311. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

Abstract

Through survey and focus groups in two provinces in Canada misunderstanding and confusion surrounding Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation (LDIR) is explored specifically surrounding medical procedures, risk, and benefits. Generally people associated the word radiation with harm, but when asked participants were not concerned about LDIR. Approximately equal numbers (40%) thought LDIR was 'difficult' as those that thought it was 'easy' but research results reveal confusion about the definition of and sources of LDIR. Most people believed the benefits of LDIR outweighed the risks. Further, many had inaccurate views of 'high' dose radiation. Scientists and the Canadian regulator were determined to be the most trusted sources of information while elected officials and industry representatives the least trusted. Participants wanted more information on whether LDIR was a problem in Canada, what the risks were associated with it, as well as the applicable protections, rules and regulations. Focus group participants expressed a preference for face-to-face exchange of information, but mass media remains an important source of information as the first-place people check for answers. Future research surrounding behavioural science and LDIR communications, and deep LDIR science communication will be important in addressing this issue.

Keywords: Information sources; Low-dose ionizing radiation; Perceptions of radiation; Public radiation knowledge; Trust.

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
  • Humans
  • Radiation Monitoring*
  • Radiation, Ionizing