Development of algorithms to estimate EQ-5D and derive health utilities from WHOQOL-HIV Bref: a mapping study

Qual Life Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2497-2508. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02534-1. Epub 2020 May 25.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate different families of applicable models available for utility mapping between World Health Organization Quality of Life for HIV-abbreviated version (WHOQOL-HIV Bref) and EQ-5D-3L and to propose an optimised algorithm to estimate health utilities of people living with HIV.

Methods: Estimation dataset was collected between July 2014 and September 2016 in a cross-sectional study including 1526 people living with HIV/Aids (PLWH) under care at the Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas-FIOCRUZ, in Brazil. Data of WHOQOL-HIV Bref and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires were collected. Fisher's exact tests were used for testing WHOQOL-HIV Bref response frequencies among groups of responses to each of the five EQ-5D-3L domains. Multiple correspondence analyses (MCA) were used to inspect the relationships between both instrument responses. Different families of applicable models available for utility mapping between WHOQOL-HIV Bref and EQ-5D-3L were adjusted for the prediction of disutility.

Results: Candidate models' performances using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) were similarly good, which was evidenced by the overlapping of its 95% confidence intervals of the mean tenfold cross-validation or estimated generalisation errors. However, the Hurdle Logistic-Log-Normal model was better on average according to generalisation errors both in the prediction of Brazilian utility values (MAE = 0.1037, MSE = 0.0178, and RMSE = 0.1332) and for those of the UK (MAE = 0.1476, MSE = 0.0443, and RMSE = 0.2099).

Conclusions: Mapping EQ-5D-3L responses or deriving health utilities directly from WHOQOL-HIV Bref responses can be a valid alternative for settings with no preference-based health utility data.

Keywords: Algorithms; Cost–utility analysis; Health economics; Health-related quality of life.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Quality of Life / psychology*