Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR "Ensembles", MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors

Molecules. 2021 Mar 9;26(5):1484. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051484.

Abstract

Proteins are molecular machines requiring flexibility to function. Crystallographic B-factors and Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations both provide insights into protein flexibility on an atomic scale. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lacks a universally accepted analog of the B-factor. However, a lack of convergence in atomic coordinates in an NMR-based structure calculation also suggests atomic mobility. This paper describes a pattern in the coordinate uncertainties of backbone heavy atoms in NMR-derived structural "ensembles" first noted in the development of FindCore2 (previously called Expanded FindCore: DA Snyder, J Grullon, YJ Huang, R Tejero, GT Montelione, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 82 (S2), 219-230) and demonstrates that this pattern exists in coordinate variances across MD trajectories but not in crystallographic B-factors. This either suggests that MD trajectories and NMR "ensembles" capture motional behavior of peptide bond units not captured by B-factors or indicates a deficiency common to force fields used in both NMR and MD calculations.

Keywords: Friedman’s test; backbone atom coordinate variances and uncertainties; superimposition.

MeSH terms

  • Adenosine Monophosphate / analogs & derivatives
  • Adenosine Monophosphate / chemistry
  • Computational Biology / methods
  • Crystallography / methods
  • Elasticity / physiology*
  • Flexural Strength / physiology*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy / methods
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulation
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular / methods
  • Protein Conformation
  • Proteins / chemistry*

Substances

  • Proteins
  • Adenosine Monophosphate
  • 3'-(1-butylphosphoryl)adenosine