Real-life evidence about the use of intravenous brivaracetam in urgent seizures: The BRIV-IV study

Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Oct:147:109384. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109384. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

Abstract

Purpose: Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice.

Methods: BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation.

Results: A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam.

Conclusion: IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Keywords: Brivaracetam; Emergency setting; Intravenous; Real-life evidence; Urgent seizures.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anticonvulsants / adverse effects
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Epilepsy* / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Pyrrolidinones / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Seizures / chemically induced
  • Seizures / drug therapy
  • Status Epilepticus* / drug therapy
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticonvulsants
  • brivaracetam
  • Pyrrolidinones