Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

559 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Results By Year timeline is not available.
Page 1
Cardiac safety research consortium "shock II" think tank report: Advancing practical approaches to generating evidence for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.
Samsky MD, Krucoff MW, Morrow DA, Abraham WT, Aguel F, Althouse AD, Chen E, Cigarroa JE, DeVore AD, Farb A, Gilchrist IC, Henry TD, Hochman JS, Kapur NK, Morrow V, Ohman EM, O'Neill WW, Piña IL, Proudfoot AG, Sapirstein JS, Seltzer JH, Senatore F, Shinnar M, Simonton CA, Tehrani BN, Thiele H, Truesdell AG, Waksman R, Rao SV. Samsky MD, et al. Am Heart J. 2020 Dec;230:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Am Heart J. 2020. PMID: 33011148 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Vasopressors independently associated with mortality in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
Basir MB, Lemor A, Gorgis S, Taylor AM, Tehrani B, Truesdell AG, Bharadwaj A, Kolski B, Patel K, Gelormini J, Todd J, Lasorda D, Smith C, Riley R, Marso S, Federici R, Kapur NK, O'Neill WW; National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative Investigators. Basir MB, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):650-657. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29895. Epub 2021 Aug 3. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022. PMID: 34343409 Clinical Trial.
Evaluating the learning curve in the prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subanalysis of the PROTECT II study.
Henriques JP, Ouweneel DM, Naidu SS, Palacios IF, Popma J, Ohman EM, O'Neill WW. Henriques JP, et al. Am Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):472-479.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.018. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Am Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24655695 Clinical Trial.
559 results