van Enst WA - Search Results

1

Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.

Naaktgeboren CA, van Enst WA, Ochodo EA, de Groot JA, Hooft L, Leeflang MM, Bossuyt PM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB. Naaktgeboren CA, et al. Among authors: van enst wa. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1200-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jul 22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 25063558 Review.

2

Identification of additional trials in prospective trial registers for Cochrane systematic reviews.

van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Hooft L. van Enst WA, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042812. Epub 2012 Aug 15. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22916163 Free PMC article. Review.

3

Pharmacological treatment of dementia: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

van de Glind EM, van Enst WA, van Munster BC, Olde Rikkert MG, Scheltens P, Scholten RJ, Hooft L. van de Glind EM, et al. Among authors: van munster bc, van enst wa. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36(3-4):211-28. doi: 10.1159/000353892. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013. PMID: 23941762 Free article. Review.

4

Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.

Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Korevaar DA, et al. Among authors: van enst wa. Evid Based Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):47-54. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101637. Epub 2013 Dec 24. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 24368333 Review.

5

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study.

Ochodo EA, van Enst WA, Naaktgeboren CA, de Groot JA, Hooft L, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM. Ochodo EA, et al. Among authors: van enst wa. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 3;14:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-33. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 24588874 Free PMC article.

6

Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.

van Enst WA, Ochodo E, Scholten RJ, Hooft L, Leeflang MM. van Enst WA, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 May 23;14:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-70. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 24884381 Free PMC article.

7

Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.

van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. van Enst WA, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jul 2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24996667 Review.

8

Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD.

Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, Leeflang MM, Hooft L, Smidt N, Bossuyt PM. Korevaar DA, et al. Among authors: van enst wa. Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):781-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141160. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Radiology. 2015. PMID: 25350641

9

Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.

van Enst WA, Naaktgeboren CA, Ochodo EA, de Groot JA, Leeflang MM, Reitsma JB, Scholten RJ, Moons KG, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. van Enst WA, et al. Syst Rev. 2015 May 9;4:66. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0049-8. Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25956716 Free PMC article.

10

Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.

Naaktgeboren CA, Ochodo EA, Van Enst WA, de Groot JAH, Hooft L, Leeflang MMG, Bossuyt PM, Moons KGM, Reitsma JB. Naaktgeboren CA, et al. Among authors: van enst wa. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jan 15;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0108-4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 26772804 Free PMC article. Review.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

19 results

Search Page