The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic appendicectomy on the incidence of histologically normal appendices. Between 1987 and 1997, 1220 consecutives patients--with an average age of 23.5 years (17-73) and including 841 women (69%)--underwent appendicectomy due to the presence of at least one of the following 3 criteria: right iliac fossa guarding, fever greater than 38 degrees C and hyperleucocytosis greater than 10,000. Patients were divided into two group.: First group with 930 patients were operated by laparotomy and the other group of 355 patients underwent laparoscopic exploration with appendicectomy when macroscopic abnormalities were observed (290 cases). In all cases, the appendices were examined under blind conditions and classified as normal or pathological, and were subsequently classified according to the nature and the severity of the lesions. In group I (laparotomy), the incidence of histologically normal appendices was 25.1%. In group II (laparoscopic), this incidence was only 8.2%. The difference was significant (p = 0.015). In 65 cases (18.3%), a macroscopically normal appendix was left in place: in 55 cases the symptoms were due to another identified cause, however, in 10 cases no cause was found. This study suggests that laparoscopy significantly reduces the number of histologically normal appendices because an other cause is identified more easily provided macroscopically normal appendices are not removed with a small proportion (5-10%) cases of early appendicitis with only mucosal involvement. In the absence of other causes for the symptoms, a three-day course of antibiotics can be tried in order to treat possible mucosal lesions. This approach reduces costs without having any adverse consequences on outcome.