Final results of a screening campaign for prostate cancer

Eur Urol. 1999 Jan;35(1):26-31. doi: 10.1159/000019815.

Abstract

Objective: To detect curable prostate cancer in a male Spanish population. The results of screening 2,576 men are reported.

Patients and methods: Patients underwent digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination. Any patient with suspicious DRE or PSA > 4 ng/ml was further evaluated with transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the tests or combinations of tests were determined.

Results: Mean age was 59.9 years (median 58 years). Ninety-four patients (3.6%) had abnormal DRE while PSA was > 4 ng/ml in 169 patients (6.5% of the total). We needed 6.8 biopsies to prove one cancer. PSA had the highest sensitivity (93%), whereas DRE had the highest specificity (97%). The positive predictive value rose to 78.9% when both DRE and PSA were abnormal. Clinically advanced tumor stages (> or = T3) were commoner (39.4%) than in similar series.

Conclusions: PSA should be the first diagnostic test in a screening program for prostate cancer. Neither DRE nor TRUS are necessary in patients with PSA < 4 ng/ml. In the light of our findings, we cannot encourage screening programs for prostate cancer for the time being.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood
  • Biopsy
  • Endosonography
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Palpation*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prevalence
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / blood*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / blood
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Rectum / diagnostic imaging
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Spain / epidemiology
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen