Efficacy of PdB in preventing intraoperative risk of infectious diseases

World J Surg. 1998 Oct;22(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1007/s002689900523.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the number of punctures surgeons and assistants suffer during operations involving a laparotomy during the intraabdominal and closure phases; and (2) determine if the number of puncture injuries during wound closure can be reduced using a new surgical instrument (PdB) that protects the surgeon's hands and the patient's viscera against needlesticks. For the first objective, all laparotomies performed during 1 month (n = 52) were controlled, collecting the gloves used and determining the number of perforations. For the second objective, a randomized prospective controlled study, involving two series of 100 medial laparotomies, was carried out. The incidence of perforations was 29% during the intraabdominal phase and 16% during the wound closure phase. The glove perforation rate while closing medial laparotomies was 31.5% if the PdB was not used and 3% if the PdB was used (p < 0.0001). The glove perforation rate during laparotomy is significant, but with the use of the PdB this incidence can be significantly reduced.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Muscles / surgery
  • Equipment Design
  • Finger Injuries / prevention & control*
  • General Surgery
  • Gloves, Surgical
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / prevention & control
  • Intraoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Laparotomy / instrumentation*
  • Needlestick Injuries / prevention & control*
  • Physician Assistants
  • Prospective Studies
  • Suture Techniques / instrumentation*