Background and objectives: Severe lumbar pain following epidural injection of 2-chloroprocaine is usually associated with the Nesacaine-MPF solution available in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine if the solution distributed in Canada (Nesacaine-CE), which contains calcium disodium edetate (0.1 mg/mL) and sodium bisulfite (0.7 mg/mL) but no disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, is associated with back pain or spasm when compared with epidural lidocaine.
Methods: With use of a prospective, double-blind, randomized design, 30 patients scheduled to undergo outpatient knee arthroscopy under epidural anesthesia were divided into two groups to received 30 mL of either Nesacaine-CE 3% (group A) or lidocaine 1.33% (group B). Postoperative pain in the lumbar area was assessed twice by a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) before patients left the hospital and 24 hours later by phone. The lumbar area was palpated to search for muscle spasm before discharge from hospital.
Results: More patients receiving Nesacaine-CE than receiving lidocaine suffered from back pain in the recovery room (four vs none P = .03) and before leaving the hospital (nine vs one P = .001). Higher VAS scores (mean +/- SE) were obtained after Nesacaine CE then after lidocaine in the recovery room (0.5 +/- 0.24 vs 0.0 +/- 0.0, p = .049) and before leaving the hospital (1.8 +/- 0.5 vs 0.1 +/- 0.1, P = .001). No difference existed 24 hours later between the two groups with regard to the prevalence of back pain or VAS scores. No muscle spasm was detected.
Conclusion: No cases of severe backache were observed. However, epidural Nesacaine-CE 3% was associated with mild back pain, generally confined to the area of needle insertion, when compared with lidocaine 1.33%.