[Truth disclosure to patients diagnosed with cancer]

Aten Primaria. 1996 Sep 15;18(4):186-9.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objective: To find the sort of information given to cancer patients in PC and the factors which affect the disclosure of the diagnosis.

Design: A descriptive crossover study, carried out through a personal interview.

Setting: A county hospital with no oncology service.

Patients: All those patients with cancer (histologically confirmed) admitted to the hospital during April and May 1993.

Measurements and main results: Each patient was asked what illness he/she had, who told him/her and where, along with his/her sociodemographic details. Later the date of diagnosis and the site and spread of the tumour were taken from the medical records. Out of 108 patients under study, 8 knew they had cancer, 1 said he/she had a tumour and 11 believed they had "something bad". 7 patients had no information about their illness and 81 gave alternative diagnoses (inflammation, cyst...). Disclosure was more common in the cases of breast cancer, haematological cancer and those diagnosed over 6 months previously. No significant differences regarding the spread of the tumour or the sociodemographic variables were found.

Conclusions: The disclosure of a diagnosis of cancer is the exception, not the rule. Concealment is only abandoned in the case of potentially curable tumours and those which offer a longer life expectancy.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Neoplasms / psychology
  • Truth Disclosure*