In summary, we have a multidimensional treatment program that attempts to integrate psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, systemic, psychopharmacologic, and 12-step interventions. For patients who have not had previous treatments or patients who are young adolescents, we do not emphasize the 12-step approach. For our difficult-to-treat patients, our current overall impression is that the benefits of adding the 12-step component have outweighed the costs. We began the program with an expressed intent of experimenting with the integration. Staff were subsequently recruited who were open to the experiment and the success of the integration has been a function of the flexibility within the staff. Our hunch is that this integration would not work as well with an existing staff who harbored prejudice toward either position. Actually, we have found working on the integration quite invigorating. Our recovering counselors have raised issues that we have not heard raised in the more traditional settings we have been associated with. Likewise, we have seen our counselors grow professionally from hearing alternative views of why individuals struggle and how they get better. The exchange has been synergistic rather than divisive. Although we are encouraged by our early experience, it is the long-term outcome that will clarify the relative usefulness of this treatment strategy. We are confident that as we live with the integration longer, more of the advantages and disadvantages will become apparent and perhaps we can refine our understanding of which subgroup of patients makes most use of this type of integrated approach.