Clinical management of nonhealing periradicular pathosis. Surgery versus endodontic retreatment

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Aug;82(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80259-9.

Abstract

Objectives: This prospective randomized study compared the outcome of retreatment and surgical intervention in root canal treated teeth with nonhealing periradicular pathosis.

Study design: One such tooth from each of 38 patients was randomly allotted to retreatment or root-end resection and root-end filling. Treatment outcome after 1 year was evaluated and compared clinically and radiographically.

Results: The success rate for surgery was higher than for conventional retreatment, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: For management of nonhealing periradicular pathosis associated with root canal treated teeth, surgical intervention should be considered as an alternative to retreatment. In cases with a similar prognosis for both modes of treatment, the choice should be governed by consideration of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Apicoectomy
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Chronic Disease
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Periapical Diseases / surgery
  • Periapical Diseases / therapy*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retreatment
  • Retrograde Obturation*
  • Root Canal Obturation*
  • Tooth, Nonvital
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing