Comparison of two methods for detecting varicella-zoster virus antibody with varicella-zoster virus cell-mediated immunity

J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Feb;34(2):445-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.445-446.1996.

Abstract

We evaluated an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA; BioWhittaker) and a latex agglutination (LA; Becton Dickinson) for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody determination, using cell-mediated immunity (CMI) as a "gold standard." VZV EIA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87, 91, 87, and 91%, respectively, compared with CMI. Correlation was excellent except when the varicella index was 0.9 to 1.2. We defined sera with varicella indices of 0.9 to 1.2 as indeterminate. LA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96, 91, 97, and 90%, respectively, compared with EIA. LA reactivity only at a 1:2 dilution did not correlate with CMI, but sera reactive at dilutions of > or = 1:8 indirectly did. We defined indeterminate sera as those reactive at 1:2 and nonreactive at 1:8. EIA and LA were equivalent for determining VZV immune status, and both methods required modified criteria of interpretation to increase their specificity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral / blood*
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods*
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / statistics & numerical data
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • False Negative Reactions
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Herpesvirus 3, Human / immunology*
  • Humans
  • Immunity, Cellular*
  • Latex Fixation Tests / methods*
  • Latex Fixation Tests / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral