Popular perceptions and knowledge about cutaneous leishmaniasis and its treatment were studied in an endemic area of subtropical Northwest Ecuador. Although most of the adults surveyed were familiar with the disease, the vector, and traditional treatments, many showed a lack of knowledge about transmission of the disease, ulcer healing, and conventional treatment. Gender was found to have a significant impact on disease risk, perceptions, and treatment knowledge. Males experienced a risk of contracting cutaneous leishmaniasis that was almost triple that of women. Men were also more likely to perceive that the disease seriously diminished the victim's capacity to work. Women, on the other hand, were more prone to perceive that cutaneous leishmaniasis was a serious disease that significantly decreased self-esteem. Although 80% of the subjects knew at least one method of treating the disease, women tended to know more methods than men. Most of 150 different therapies reported involved the use of indigenous plants, chemicals, acids, antibiotics, heat treatments, or petroleum by-products. Some of these treatments could have clinical value. However, only 7% of the subjects knew about pentavalent antimonials. Almost 70% of the subjects with a past or present infection history were treated solely by traditional methods; only 12% received a full course of Glucantime, while 7.5% got an incomplete course. The findings indicate that it will be important to consider the identified gaps in knowledge and gender perceptions regarding the disease and its treatment when planning future control programs.
PIP: In 1989-1991, a study of 466 children and adults (i.e., = or 18 years) living in 26 small agricultural villages in the remote subtropical forest of Northwest Pichincha Province on the western slope of the Andes Mountains in Ecuador examined perceptions and knowledge of cutaneous leishmaniasis and local methods used to treat it. 13% of all adult subjects had active cutaneous leishmaniasis. Men were 2.83 times more likely to have cutaneous leishmaniasis than women (p = .037), perhaps due to increased occupational exposure (i.e., agricultural work in the rain forest) and social exposure (i.e., outside during times of maximum vector activity). They were more likely to consider it to have a negative effect on the affected person's capacity to work (77.3% vs. 61.2%; p = .025). Women were more likely than men to perceive it as a severe disease (85.2% vs. 68%; p = .015) that reduced the victim's self- esteem (89.9% vs.75.7%; p = .017). 97.3% of subjects were familiar with the sandfly vector, yet less than 10% knew it was responsible for cutaneous leishmaniasis. 80% of adults knew at least 1 treatment option. Women could name more treatment methods than men (1.6 vs. 1.2; p .05). The adults named more than 150 treatment options, most of which were traditional methods involving the application of topical preparations or objects to the ulcers (e.g., herbs, trees, or other plants and homemade rum, wood alcohol, iodine, menthol, methiolate, and sulfur). Just 7% were familiar with antimonial drugs. Most adults and children who had either active cutaneous leishmaniasis or a history of past infection (68%) had been treated with traditional methods. 8.5% received both traditional treatments and Glucantime. Just 12% received the full course of Glucantime therapy. 7.5% received an incomplete course of glucantime therapy. These results show that public health officials need to consider the gaps in knowledge and gender perceptions of cutaneous leishmaniasis and in its treatment when they plan control programs.