[Myocardial infarction and revascularization. Current indications]

Rev Med Interne. 1995;16(9):673-83. doi: 10.1016/0248-8663(96)80770-3.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The physiopathologic role of thrombosis in the genesis of myocardial infarction, began to be suspected early in the 20th century but its logical treatment, thrombolysis, was first used on a large scale only ten years ago. Today, it is well established that short, middle and long-term mortality is correlated to coronary permeability, the delay in the revascularization treatment start-up, its efficacy, its swiftness of action, and to the maintaining of permeability following reperfusion. The importance of time elapse before reperfusion is obtained was demonstrated as early as 1986 by the GISSI study. According to this study, the administration of streptokinase (compared to a conventional treatment) reduced mortality at 21 days respectively by 47%, 23%, and 17%, depending on whether patients were treated within one hour, three hours, or between 3 and 6 hours following the onset of the painful symptoms. One of the major teachings of the GUSTO study, reported at the end of 1993, was the confirmation of the so-called "open artery" theory: mortality at 30 days was of 4.5% among patients whose coronary circulation was restored at the 90th minute, whatever thrombolytic treatment was used, compared to 8.9% when the coronary artery remained occluded. The value of aspirin in preserving coronary permeability following thrombolysis was demonstrated by the ISIS-2 study: mortality at 5 weeks was reduced by 23% in the group of patients randomised to receive only aspirin, while it was reduced by 25% in the group of patients randomised to be treated with streptokinase, and by 42% in the group randomised to receive both aspirin and streptokinase, compared to the group who received neither aspirin nor streptokinase. However, mortality during the first days following randomisation was identical among the groups, with or without aspirin, which suggested its action was rather one of prevention against reocclusion than one of accelerating dissolution of the thrombus. However, in spite of improved therapeutical protocols, a normal flow, which is the major criteria for a reduced mortality, is only obtained at the 90th minute in 54% of the patients who were administered the up-to-date treatment ie aspirin-accelerated t-PA-heparin in combination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy
  • Myocardial Infarction / surgery
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy*
  • Myocardial Revascularization*
  • Patient Selection
  • Risk Factors
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / adverse effects