Fifteen dogs with signs of small and, or, large bowel disease that responded clinically to an exclusion diet were studied, using differential sugar absorption as an objective parameter of the mucosal response to the diet. Intestinal permeability and function were assessed by determining the urinary excretion ratios of lactulose/rhamnose and xylose/3-O-methylglucose, respectively, following oral administration of a mixture of these four sugars. Five dogs, all retrievers, were tentatively diagnosed as having dietary hypersensitivity, based upon resolution of clinical signs and normalisation of high intestinal permeability following an exclusion diet and recurrence of signs (in four of five dogs) upon challenge with the original diet. The fifth dog did not become symptomatic when challenged, but intestinal permeability increased. The remaining 10 dogs were diagnosed as having food intolerance, based upon clinical improvement on an exclusion diet, relapse on challenge with their original diet, but lack of improvement in intestinal permeability. These findings suggest that a differential sugar absorption test may be useful to determine the reasons for clinical response to exclusion diets. Demonstration of increased intestinal permeability with subsequent normalisation following an exclusion diet may be useful in the diagnosis of dietary hypersensitivity, while persistent abnormalities in intestinal permeability are suggestive of underlying intestinal disease and food intolerance.