The investigation of the mechanism underlying the impact of biological soft tissue sample preparation methods on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) signals can enhance the stability of LIBS signals. Our study focused on four specific preparation methods applied to pork samples: rapid freezing, fresh slicing, drying, and pressing. The influence of various preparation techniques on the signal-to-noise ratio and fluctuation of Ca, Na, Mg, and CN bands within the sample spectra was assessed. The signal-to-noise ratios for samples that were dried and pressed notably improved. And the pressing method effectively mitigated the uneven distribution of pork tissue components, displaying superior spectral line stability. To explain this phenomenon, we used the Saha-Boltzmann diagram to estimate the plasma temperature. Remarkably, there was a significant reduction in plasma temperature fluctuations across four pressed samples, with a standard deviation of 108.53. Furthermore, we undertook a classification analysis employing support vector machine models to corroborate the generalization efficacy of the sample preparation technique. Dried and pressed samples demonstrated notably higher classification accuracy, precision, and recall (all >93%) compared to frozen and fresh samples, where these metrics remained below 86%. The performance of the SVM model was ultimately evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and the Area Under the Curve (AUC). The AUC for the frozen, fresh, dried, and pressed samples was 0.854, 0.907, 0.989, and 0.996, respectively. The findings revealed that the pressing method exhibited superior performance, followed by drying, fresh slicing, and freezing, in descending order of effectiveness.