Using drugs alone in single room occupancy housing: Understanding environmental drivers of overdose risk

Taylor Fleming; Jade Boyd; Marilou Gagnon; Thomas Kerr; Ryan McNeil

doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104444

Using drugs alone in single room occupancy housing: Understanding environmental drivers of overdose risk

Int J Drug Policy. 2024 May 15:128:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104444. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Taylor Fleming¹, Jade Boyd², Marilou Gagnon³, Thomas Kerr², Ryan McNeil⁴

Affiliations

¹ British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, 270-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
² British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
³ School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada; Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Avenue, Victoria, BC V8N 5M8, Canada.
⁴ British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 10001, USA; Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 10001, USA. Electronic address: ryan.mcneil@yale.edu.

PMID: 38754243
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104444

Abstract

Background: Across North America most overdose deaths occur in housing, largely due to individuals using drugs alone. In cities, fatalities are disproportionately concentrated in low-income housing, including single room occupancy (SRO) housing. While research has highlighted how SROs operate as risk environments for various poor outcomes, there has been little attention to specific drug use practices (i.e., using alone) associated with overdose vulnerability in these spaces. This study explores how environmental contexts of SROs shape overdose risks, with specific attention to practices of using drugs alone.

Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 people who use drugs (PWUD) living in Vancouver SROs. Interviews covered topics such as social-structural environments of housing, drug use practices, and housing-based harm reduction. Thematic analysis drew on the intersectional risk environment framework.

Results: Narratives positioned SROs as extensions of public space, with similar expectations of risks and behaviours as in public spaces. For some participants, using alone in their room was characterized as a practice in claiming privacy within the context of a public existence. Participants highlighted how certain features of SRO's social-structural environments were routinely leveraged against them (e.g., security cameras, staff surveillance), suggesting using alone as a tactic to minimize risks of hyper-surveillance and punitive policies. Further, participants discussed using alone as "safer," describing how this practice mitigated place-based risks of social-structural harms (e.g., violence, criminalization) in ways that eclipsed overdose risk.

Conclusion: Using drugs alone may be understood as a spatial negotiation of vulnerability to diverse harms produced by environmental contexts of SROs. Interventions accounting for broader contextual factors (e.g., improvements housing quality/quantity, providing a safer supply of drugs) that render using alone as instrumental to survival, and that reduce the implicit threat of punishment from intensive surveillance and control practices are critical to reduce vulnerability to overdose and other harms.

Keywords: Drug use; Harm reduction; Low-income housing; Overdose.