Potential model of Scalesia pedunculata carbon sequestration through restoration efforts in agricultural fields of Galapagos

PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0302680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302680. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Scalesia pendunculata Hook.f. is the dominant tree in several highlands' areas of the Galapagos Archipelago, yet in inhabited islands the conversion to agricultural fields has reduced its cover. The transition to agroforestry systems including the species shows promising scenarios to restore its cover and to provide ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration. Here, based on field gathered data, we model the potential contribution of S. pedunculata stands in the carbon sequestration of Galapagos. Between 2013-2021, 426 S. pedunculata seedlings were planted in the highlands of Santa Cruz and Floreana islands using several restoration technologies, and their height and survival were monitored every three months. A sub-sample of 276 trees alive since 2020 was used to estimate the DBH based on plant age and height. Based on scientific literature, biomass and carbon content were estimated across time. The final modelling included the density of plants in the restoration sites, estimated DBH, potential survival by restoration treatment, and a Brownian noise to add stochastic events. Overall, survival of S. pedunculata was high in control and slightly increased by most restoration treatments. A stand of 530 trees/ha was projected to sequester ~21 Mg C/ha in 10 years. If this is replicated over all Galapagos coffee production would contribute to the reduction of -1.062% of the Galapagos carbon footprint for the same period. This study adds to compiling benefits of restoring Galapagos flora.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture* / methods
  • Biomass
  • Carbon / metabolism
  • Carbon Sequestration*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods
  • Ecosystem
  • Ecuador
  • Trees / growth & development

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the “COmON Foundation (Code: 1-63D-663). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.