Wetland plants play a crucial role in regulating soil geochemistry, influencing heavy metal (HM) speciation, bioavailability, and uptake, thus impacting phytoremediation potential. We hypothesized that variations in HM biogeochemistry within estuarine soils are controlled by distinct estuarine plant species. We evaluated the soils (pH, redox potential, rhizosphere pH, HM total concentration, and geochemical fractionation), plant parts (shoot and root), and iron plaques of three plants growing in an estuary affected by Fe-rich mine tailings. Though the integration of multiple plant and soil analysis, this work emphasizes the importance of considering geochemical pools of HM for predicting their fate. Apart from the predominance of HM associated with Fe oxides, Typha domingensis accumulated the highest Cr and Ni contents in their shoots (> 100 mg kg-1). In contrast, Hibiscus tiliaceus accumulated more Cu and Pb in their roots (> 50 mg kg-1). The differences in rhizosphere soil conditions and root bioturbation explained the different potentials between the plants by altering the soil dynamics and HM's bioavailability, ultimately affecting their uptake. This study suggests that Eleocharis acutangula is not suitable for phytoextraction or phytostabilization, whereas Typha domingensis shows potential for Cr and Ni phytoextraction. In addition, we first showed Hibiscus tiliaceus as a promising wood species for Cu and Pb phytostabilization.
Keywords: Macrophytes; Metal biogeochemistry; Phytoextraction; Phytostabilization; Sea hibiscus.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.