Optimizing assessment of low frequency H-reflex depression in persons with spinal cord injury

PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0300053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300053. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Considering the growing interest in clinical applications of neuromodulation, assessing effects of various modulatory approaches is increasingly important. Monosynaptic spinal reflexes undergo depression following repeated activation, offering a means to quantify neuromodulatory influences. Following spinal cord injury (SCI), changes in reflex modulation are associated with spasticity and impaired motor control. To assess disrupted reflex modulation, low-frequency depression (LFD) of Hoffman (H)-reflex excitability is examined, wherein the amplitudes of conditioned reflexes are compared to an unconditioned control reflex. Alternatively, some studies utilize paired-pulse depression (PPD) in place of the extended LFD train. While both protocols induce similar amounts of H-reflex depression in neurologically intact individuals, this may not be the case for persons with neuropathology. We compared the H-reflex depression elicited by PPD and by trains of 3-10 pulses to an 11-pulse LFD protocol in persons with incomplete SCI. The amount of depression produced by PPD was less than an 11-pulse train (mean difference = 0.137). When compared to the 11-pulse train, the 5-pulse train had a Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905 and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.818. Therefore, a 5-pulse train for assessing LFD elicits modulation similar to the 11-pulse train and thus we recommend its use in lieu of longer trains.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Female
  • H-Reflex* / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Spinal Cord Injuries* / complications
  • Spinal Cord Injuries* / physiopathology

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the NIH National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; https://www.nichd.nih.gov) R01HD079009 (E.C.F.-F.). Financial support was provided by the Jack and Dana McCallum Neurorehabilitation Training Fellowship (C.J.C.) during manuscript development. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.