Revised Recommendations on Methods for Assessing Multimorbidity Changes over Time: Aligning the Method to the Purpose

Abstract

Background: The rapidly growing field of multimorbidity research demonstrates that changes in multimorbidity in mid- and late-life have far reaching effects on important person-centered outcomes, such as health-related quality of life. However, there are few organizing frameworks and comparatively little work weighing the merits and limitations of various quantitative methods applied to the longitudinal study of multimorbidity.

Methods: We identify and discuss methods aligned to specific research objectives with the goals of 1) establishing a common language for assessing longitudinal changes in multimorbidity, 2) illuminating gaps in our knowledge regarding multimorbidity progression and critical periods of change, and 3) informing research to identify groups that experience different rates and divergent etiological pathways of disease progression linked to deterioration in important health-related outcomes.

Results: We review practical issues in the measurement of multimorbidity, longitudinal analysis of health-related data, operationalizing change over time, and discuss methods that align with four general typologies for research objectives in the longitudinal study of multimorbidity: 1) examine individual change in multimorbidity, 2) identify sub-groups that follow similar trajectories of multimorbidity progression, 3) understand when, how, and why individuals or groups shift to more advanced stages of multimorbidity, and 4) examine the co-progression of multimorbidity with key health domains.

Conclusion: This work encourages a systematic approach to the quantitative study of change in multimorbidity and provides a valuable resource for researchers working to measure and minimize the deleterious effects of multimorbidity on aging populations.

Keywords: Disease Progression; Methodology; Multiple Chronic Diseases.