Comparative Study of Spinal, Epidural, and Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Arvind Tomar; Jay Brijesh Singh Yadav; Dheer Singh; Rakesh Bahadur Singh; Reena Rani Verma; Sarika Pandey

doi:10.7759/cureus.58099

Comparative Study of Spinal, Epidural, and Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Cureus. 2024 Apr 12;16(4):e58099. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58099. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Authors

Arvind Tomar¹, Jay Brijesh Singh Yadav¹, Dheer Singh¹, Rakesh Bahadur Singh¹, Reena Rani Verma², Sarika Pandey¹

Affiliations

¹ Anesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, IND.
² Physiology, SVS Medical College, Mahabubnagar, IND.

Abstract

Background: Sequential combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is probably the greatest advancement in the central neuraxial block in this decade for geriatric patients due to the potential advantages of both spinal and epidural anesthesia. This study was designed to compare the clinical effects of sequential CSEA versus spinal and epidural anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Methods: Ninety patients aged 65 to 80 years were randomly allocated into three groups of 30 each. Group A (n=30) patients were administered spinal anesthesia with 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, group B (n=30) received epidural anesthesia with 15 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, and group C (n=30) received sequential CSEA with 1 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 6 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine given through epidural route to extend the block up to T10. Patients were observed for hemodynamic parameters, sensory and motor block, total dose required to establish the desired level, and patient satisfaction score.

Results: None of the patients were excluded in the study. Group A patients reported rapid onset of sensory block (3.08±11.57 minutes) compared to group B (11.57±1.48 minutes), and group C (5.47±1.25 minutes). The onset of motor block was expeditious in group A (8.08±1.0 minutes) compared to group B (20.33±1.86 minutes) and group C (15.53±1.31 minutes). Patients in group B had maximum hemodynamic stability but with delayed onset and were technically more complex than group A. Patients in group C were hemodynamically more stable than group A. They had a faster onset of action with decreased doses of local anesthetic drug required compared to group B.

Conclusion: Sequential CSEA is a safe, effective, and reliable technique that combines the advantages of both spinal and epidural while minimizing their disadvantages. It has the advantage of stable hemodynamic parameters along with the provision of prolongation analgesia for geriatric patients undergoing TURP surgery.

Keywords: epidural; geriatric; sequential; spinal; turp.