A multifaceted suite of metrics for comparative myoelectric prosthesis controller research

PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0291279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291279. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Upper limb robotic (myoelectric) prostheses are technologically advanced, but challenging to use. In response, substantial research is being done to develop person-specific prosthesis controllers that can predict a user's intended movements. Most studies that test and compare new controllers rely on simple assessment measures such as task scores (e.g., number of objects moved across a barrier) or duration-based measures (e.g., overall task completion time). These assessment measures, however, fail to capture valuable details about: the quality of device arm movements; whether these movements match users' intentions; the timing of specific wrist and hand control functions; and users' opinions regarding overall device reliability and controller training requirements. In this work, we present a comprehensive and novel suite of myoelectric prosthesis control evaluation metrics that better facilitates analysis of device movement details-spanning measures of task performance, control characteristics, and user experience. As a case example of their use and research viability, we applied these metrics in real-time control experimentation. Here, eight participants without upper limb impairment compared device control offered by a deep learning-based controller (recurrent convolutional neural network-based classification with transfer learning, or RCNN-TL) to that of a commonly used controller (linear discriminant analysis, or LDA). The participants wore a simulated prosthesis and performed complex functional tasks across multiple limb positions. Analysis resulting from our suite of metrics identified 16 instances of a user-facing problem known as the "limb position effect". We determined that RCNN-TL performed the same as or significantly better than LDA in four such problem instances. We also confirmed that transfer learning can minimize user training burden. Overall, this study contributes a multifaceted new suite of control evaluation metrics, along with a guide to their application, for use in research and testing of myoelectric controllers today, and potentially for use in broader rehabilitation technologies of the future.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Artificial Limbs*
  • Deep Learning
  • Electromyography*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Movement / physiology
  • Neural Networks, Computer
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Robotics
  • Upper Extremity / physiology
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported supported by the Sensory Motor Adaptive Rehabilitation Technology (SMART) Network at the University of Alberta, the Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute (Amii), and the Canada CIFAR AI Chairs program. HW was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) CGS-D, the Killam Trusts, and P.E.O. International. JH was supported by NSERC DG RGPIN-2019-05961, and PP was supported by NSERC DG RGPIN-2015-03646. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.