Impact of a Whole-Food, High-Soluble Fiber Diet on the Gut-Muscle Axis in Aged Mice

Nutrients. 2024 Apr 28;16(9):1323. doi: 10.3390/nu16091323.

Abstract

Previous studies have identified a role for the gut microbiome and its metabolic products, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), in the maintenance of muscle mass and physical function (i.e., the gut-muscle axis), but interventions aimed at positively impacting the gut-muscle axis during aging are sparse. Gut bacteria ferment soluble fiber into SCFAs, and accordingly, to evaluate the impact of a high-soluble-fiber diet (HSFD) on the gut-muscle axis, we fed a whole-food, 3×-higher-soluble fiber-containing diet (relative to standard chow) to aged (98 weeks) C57BL/6J mice for 10 weeks. The HSFD significantly altered gut bacterial community structure and composition, but plasma SCFAs were not different, and a positive impact on muscle-related measures (when normalized to body weight) was not identified. However, when evaluating sex differences between dietary groups, female (but not male) HSFD-fed mice had significant increases for SCFAs, the quadriceps/body weight (BW) ratio, and treadmill work performance (distance run × BW), which suggests that an HSFD can positively impact the gut-muscle axis. In contrast, consistent effects in both male and female HSFD-fed mice included weight and fat loss, which suggests a positive role for an HSFD on the gut-adipose axis in aged mice.

Keywords: adiposity; aging; gut microbiome; gut–muscle axis; short-chain fatty acids; skeletal muscle; soluble fiber; weight loss.

MeSH terms

  • Aging* / physiology
  • Animals
  • Body Weight
  • Diet
  • Dietary Fiber* / administration & dosage
  • Fatty Acids, Volatile* / metabolism
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome* / physiology
  • Male
  • Mice
  • Mice, Inbred C57BL*
  • Muscle, Skeletal / metabolism

Substances

  • Dietary Fiber
  • Fatty Acids, Volatile

Grants and funding

This work was supported by The Jackson Aging Center Pilot Project Award (supported by The Jackson Laboratory’s Nathan Shock Center) (P30 AG038070), and by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), under agreement No. 58-8050-9-004 to R.A.F. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA.