Regulation-driven changes in PM2.5 sources in China from 2013 to 2019, a critical review and trend analysis

Ting Zhang; Beizhan Yan; Lucas Henneman; Patrick Kinney; Philip K Hopke

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173091

Regulation-driven changes in PM_2.5 sources in China from 2013 to 2019, a critical review and trend analysis

Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 8:934:173091. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173091. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Ting Zhang¹, Beizhan Yan², Lucas Henneman³, Patrick Kinney⁴, Philip K Hopke⁵

Affiliations

¹ Sid and Reva Dewberry Dept. of Civil, Environmental, & Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason University, USA. Electronic address: tingz.env@gmail.com.
² Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
³ Sid and Reva Dewberry Dept. of Civil, Environmental, & Infrastructure Engineering, George Mason University, USA.
⁴ Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
⁵ Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; Institute for a Sustainable Environment, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.

PMID: 38729379
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173091

Abstract

Identifying changes in source-specific fine particles (PM_2.5) over time is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory measures and informing future policy decisions. After the extreme haze events in China during 2013-14, more comprehensive and stringent policies were implemented to combat PM_2.5 pollution. To determine the effectiveness of these policies, it is necessary to assess the changes in the specific source types to which the regulations pertain. Multiple studies have been conducted over the past decade to apportion PM_2.5. The purpose of this study was to explore the available literature and conduct a critical review of the reliable results. In total, 5008 articles were screened, but only 48 studies were included for further analysis given our inclusion criteria including covering a monitoring period of ≥1 year and having enough speciation data to provide mass closure. Using these studies, we analyzed temporal and spatial trends across China from 2013 to 2019. We observed the overall decrease in the concentration contributions from all main source categories. The reductions from industry, coal and heavy oil combustion, and the related secondary sulfate were more notable, especially from 2013 to 2016-17. The contributions from biomass burning initially decreased but then increased slightly after 2016 in some locations despite new constraints on agricultural and household burning practices. Although the contributions from vehicle emissions and related secondary nitrate decreased, they gradually became the primary contributors to PM_2.5 by ∼2017. Despite the substantial improvements achieved by the air pollution regulation implementations, further improvements in air quality will require additional aggressive actions, especially those targeting vehicular emissions. Ultimately, source apportionment studies based on extended duration, fixed-site sampling are recommended to provide a more thorough understanding of the sources impacting areas and transformations in PM_2.5 sources prompted by regulatory actions.

Keywords: Air pollution regulation; China; PM(2.5); Source apportionment; Source category.

Publication types

Review