Aims: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly being used for long-term cardiac monitoring in different clinical settings. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world performance of ILRs-including the time to diagnosis- in unselected patients with different ILR indications.
Methods and results: In this multicenter, observational study, 871 patients with an indication of pre-syncope/syncope (61.9%), unexplained palpitations (10.4%), and atrial fibrillation (AF) detection with a history of cryptogenic stroke (CS) (27.7%) underwent ILR implantation. The median follow-up was 28.8 ± 12.9 months. In the presyncope/syncope group, 167 (31%) received a diagnosis established by the device. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated that 16.9% of patients had a diagnosis at 6 months, and the proportion increased to 22.5% at 1 year. Of 91 patients with palpitations, 20 (22%) received a diagnosis based on the device. The diagnosis established at 12.2% of patients at 6 months, and the proportion increased to 13.3% at 1 year. Among 241 patients with CS, 47 (19.5%) were diagnosed with AF. The diagnostic yield of the device was 10.4% at 6 months and 12.4% at 1 year. In all cases, oral anticoagulation was initiated. Overall, ILR diagnosis altered the therapeutic strategy in 26.1% in presyncope/syncope group, 2.2% in palpitations group, and 3.7% in CS group in addition to oral anticoagulation initiation.
Conclusions: In this real-world patient population, ILR determines diagnosis and initiates a new therapeutic management in nearly one fourth of patients. ILR implantation is valuable in the evaluation of patients with unexplained presyncope/syncope, CS and palpitations.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Implantable loop recorder; Palpitations; Syncope; cryptogenic stroke.
Copyright © 2024 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.