Guiding Ethical Decisions in Cochlear Implantation for the Hearing Impaired with Comorbid Psychosis

J Clin Ethics. 2024 Summer;35(2):101-106. doi: 10.1086/729415.

Abstract

AbstractCochlear implants can restore hearing in people with severe hearing loss and have a significant impact on communication, social integration, self-esteem, and quality of life. However, whether and how much clinical benefit is derived from cochlear implants varies significantly by patient and is influenced by the etiology and extent of hearing loss, medical comorbidities, and preexisting behavioral and psychosocial issues. In patients with underlying psychosis, concerns have been raised that the introduction of auditory stimuli could trigger hallucinations, worsen existing delusions, or exacerbate erratic behavior. This concern has made psychosis a relative contraindication to cochlear implant surgery. This is problematic because there is a lack of data describing this phenomenon and because the psychosocial benefits derived from improvement in auditory function may be a critical intervention for treating psychosis in some patients. The objective of this report is to provide an ethical framework for guiding clinical decision-making on cochlear implant surgery in the hearing impaired with psychosis.

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Decision-Making / ethics
  • Cochlear Implantation*
  • Cochlear Implants
  • Comorbidity
  • Decision Making / ethics
  • Ethics, Medical
  • Hearing Loss / surgery
  • Humans
  • Psychotic Disorders* / complications
  • Quality of Life