Background: The aim of palatoplasty is to create a functional palate to achieve normal speech, while minimizing post-operative complications. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of modified Furlow palatoplasty using small double-opposing Z-plasty (small-DOZ) and conventional Furlow palatoplasty (conventional-DOZ) performed in a single center.
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent Furlow palatoplasty between May 2007 and March 2014 was executed. Non-syndromic patients subjected to palatoplasty prior to 24 months of age and followed-up until at least 9 years of age were included.
Results: A total of 196 small-DOZ and 280 conventional-DOZ palatoplasty patients were included in this study. Overall, 14 patients (2.9%) developed oronasal fistula, and 40 patients (8.4%) received velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) surgery. In comparisons, oronasal fistula rate was significantly higher in conventional-DOZ (0.5% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.01), and the VPI prevalence was not significantly different (9.2% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.62). Patients who developed fistula had a significantly higher likelihood of developing VPI than patients without oronasal fistula (50.0% vs. 7.1%, respectively; p < 0.01), with an odds ratio of 13.0.
Conclusion: Both modalities of palatoplasty yielded commendable velopharyngeal function in the long-term follow-up. The small-DOZ with reduced tension lowered the risk of oronasal fistula.
Keywords: Cleft palate; Double-opposing Z-plasty; Long-term outcome; Oronasal fistula; Palatoplasty; Velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.