Probing cell proliferation: Considerations for dye selection

Abstract

Broadly speaking, cell tracking dyes are fluorescent compounds that bind stably to components on or within the cells so the fate of the labeled cells can be followed. Their staining should be bright and homogeneous without affecting cell function. For purposes of monitoring cell proliferation, each time a cell divides the intensity of cell tracking dye should diminish equally between daughter cells. These dyes can be grouped into two different classes. Protein reactive dyes label cells by reacting covalently but non-selectively with intracellular proteins. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) is the prototypic general protein label. Membrane intercalating dyes label cells by partitioning non-selectively and non-covalently within the plasma membrane. The PKH membrane dyes are examples of lipophilic compounds whose chemistry allows for their retention within biological membranes without affecting cellular growth, viability, or proliferation when used properly. Here we provide considerations based for labeling cell lines and peripheral blood mononuclear cells using both classes of dyes. Examples from optimization experiments are presented along with critical aspects of the staining procedures to help mitigate common risks. Of note, we present data where a logarithmically growing cell line is labeled with both a protein dye and a membrane tracking dye to compare dye loss rates over 6days. We found that dual stained cells paralleled dye loss of the corresponding single stained cells. The decrease in fluorescence intensity by protein reactive dyes, however, was more rapid than that with the membrane reactive dyes, indicating the presence of additional division-independent dye loss.

Keywords: Cell division; Cell tracking; CellTrace™ dyes; CellVue® dyes; Dye dilution; Flow cytometry; PKH dyes; Proliferation.