Risk and protective factors for self-harm and suicide behaviours among serving and ex-serving personnel of the UK Armed Forces, Canadian Armed Forces, Australian Defence Force and New Zealand Defence Force: A systematic review

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0299239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299239. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Self-harm and suicide behaviours are a major public health concern. Several factors are associated with these behaviours among military communities. Identifying these factors may have important implications for policy and clinical services. The aim of this review was to identify the risk and protective factors associated with self-harm and suicide behaviours among serving and ex-serving personnel of the United Kingdom Armed Forces, Canadian Armed Forces, Australian Defence Force and New Zealand Defence Force.

Methods: A systematic search of seven online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs and CINAHL) was conducted alongside cross-referencing, in October 2022. Following an a priori PROSPERO approved protocol (CRD42022348867), papers were independently screened and assessed for quality. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.

Results: Overall, 28 papers were included: 13 from Canada, 10 from the United Kingdom, five from Australia and none from New Zealand. Identified risk factors included being single/ex-relationship, early service leavers, shorter length of service (but not necessarily early service leavers), junior ranks, exposure to deployment-related traumatic events, physical and mental health diagnoses, and experience of childhood adversity. Protective factors included being married/in a relationship, higher educational attainment, employment, senior ranks, and higher levels of perceived social support.

Conclusion: Adequate care and support are a necessity for the military community. Prevention and intervention strategies for self-harm and suicide behaviours may be introduced early and may promote social networks as a key source of support. This review found a paucity of peer-reviewed research within some populations. More peer-reviewed research is needed, particularly among these populations where current work is limited, and regarding modifiable risk and protective factors.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Australia / epidemiology
  • Canada / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Military Personnel* / psychology
  • New Zealand / epidemiology
  • Protective Factors*
  • Risk Factors
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / epidemiology
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / prevention & control
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / psychology
  • Suicide / psychology
  • Suicide / statistics & numerical data
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology

Grants and funding

This work is part of a PhD nested within Phase 4 of the King’s Centre for Military Health Research Health and Wellbeing Cohort Study and funded by the Office of Veterans' Affairs, Cabinet Office, UK Government [Contract ref: CCZZ20A88] (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-for-veterans-affairs). NTF and SAMS secured the funding for Phase 4 of the King’s Centre for Military Health Research Health and Wellbeing Cohort Study, and CW is currently in receipt of the funded PhD studentship. The funder played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.