What drives wild pig (Sus scrofa) movement in bottomland and upland forests?

Tyler S Evans; Natasha Ellison; Melanie R Boudreau; Bronson K Strickland; Garrett M Street; Raymond B Iglay

doi:10.1186/s40462-024-00472-y

What drives wild pig (Sus scrofa) movement in bottomland and upland forests?

Mov Ecol. 2024 Apr 25;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00472-y.

Authors

Tyler S Evans¹, Natasha Ellison², Melanie R Boudreau², Bronson K Strickland², Garrett M Street², Raymond B Iglay²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, 775 Stone Boulevard, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA. tsevans04@gmail.com.
² Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, 775 Stone Boulevard, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA.

Abstract

Background: The wild pig (Sus scrofa) is an exotic species that has been present in the southeastern United States for centuries yet continues to expand into new areas dominated by bottomland and upland forests, the latter of which are less commonly associated with wild pigs. Here, we aimed to investigate wild pig movement and space use attributes typically used to guide wild pig management among multiple spatiotemporal scales. Our investigation focused on a newly invaded landscape dominated by bottomland and upland forests.

Methods: We examined (1) core and total space use using an autocorrelated kernel density estimator; (2) resource selection patterns and hot spots of space use in relation to various landscape features using step-selection analysis; and (3) daily and hourly differences in movement patterns between non-hunting and hunting seasons using generalized additive mixed models.

Results: Estimates of total space use among wild pigs (n = 9) were smaller at calculated core (1.2 ± 0.3 km²) and 90% (5.2 ± 1.5 km²) isopleths than estimates reported in other landscapes in the southeastern United States, suggesting that wild pigs were able to meet foraging, cover, and thermoregulatory needs within smaller areas. Generally, wild pigs selected areas closer to herbaceous, woody wetlands, fields, and perennial streams, creating corridors of use along these features. However, selection strength varied among individuals, reinforcing the generalist, adaptive nature of wild pigs. Wild pigs also showed a tendency to increase movement from fall to winter, possibly paralleling increases in hard mast availability. During this time, there were also increases in anthropogenic pressures (e.g. hunting), causing movements to become less diurnal as pressure increased.

Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that movement patterns by exotic generalists must be understood across individuals, the breadth of landscapes they can invade, and multiple spatiotemporal scales. This improved understanding will better inform management strategies focused on curbing emerging invasions in novel landscapes, while also protecting native natural resources.

Keywords: Anthropogenic; Exotic species; Invasion; Resource selection; Space use; Spatiotemporal.