Parthenogenesis, identity, and value

Bioethics. 2024 Jun;38(5):419-424. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13289. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

Abstract

Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction in which a gamete (ovum or sperm) develops without being fertilized. Tomer Jordi Chaffer uses parthenogenesis to challenge Don Marquis' future-like-ours (FLO) argument against abortion. According to Marquis, (1) what makes it morally wrong to kill us is that it would deprive us of a possible future that we might come to value-a future "like ours" (FLO) and (2) human fetuses are numerically identical to any adult human organism they may develop into, and thus have a FLO. Chaffer contends that if human ova are capable of parthenogenesis, then they would have a FLO, which contraception may deprive them of, but contends this is absurd. Bruce P. Blackshaw challenges Chaffer, contending sexually fertilized embryos are not identical to unfertilized ovum, but this would yield a more absurd implication, that fertilization deprives an ovum of a FLO! Here I show Marquis' account of identity rules out both Chaffer's and Blackshaw's accounts.

Keywords: Don Marquis; abortion; contraception; future‐like‐ours; identity; metaphysics; parthenogenesis; stem cell research; twinning.

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Induced / ethics
  • Female
  • Fertilization
  • Fetus
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Ovum
  • Parthenogenesis*
  • Pregnancy
  • Value of Life