Impact of Regional Metastasis on Survival for Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

Callisia N Clarke; Erin Ward; Valencia Henry; Kaitlyn Nimmer; Alexandria Phan; Doug B Evans

doi:10.1245/s10434-024-15249-1

Impact of Regional Metastasis on Survival for Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15249-1. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Callisia N Clarke¹, Erin Ward², Valencia Henry², Kaitlyn Nimmer², Alexandria Phan², Doug B Evans²

Affiliations

¹ Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. cnclarke@mcw.edu.
² Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

PMID: 38652199
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15249-1

Abstract

Background: Controversy exists regarding the benefit of lymphadenectomy for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNET).

Patients and methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) published between 1990 and 2021. Studies of functional PNET were excluded. Reported incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival analysis of either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) were required for inclusion.

Results: Overall, 52 studies analyzing 24,608 PNET met the inclusion criteria. The reported LNM rate for NF-PNET ranged from 7 to 64 % (median 24.5%). Reported LNM rates ranged from 7 to 51% (median 11%) for NF-PNET< 2 cm in 14 studies and 29-47% (median 38%) in NF-PNET > 2 cm. In total, 19 studies (66%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on DFS. Additionally, 21 studies (60%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on OS. Two studies investigating the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) found LND had the greatest impact for large, high-grade tumors. The overall quality of available evidence was low as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System.

Conclusions: Published literature evaluating the impact of regional LNM and LND in PNET is confounded by heterogeneity in practice patterns and the retrospective nature of these cohort studies. Most studies suggest high rates of LNM in NF-PNET that negatively impact DFS and OS. Given the high rate of LNM in NF-PNET and its potential detrimental effect on DFS and OS, we recommend lymphadenectomy be completed for NF-PNET > 2 cm and strongly considered for NF-PNET < 2 cm.