A gastrocnemius contracture is a common problem that results in decreased ankle dorsiflexion that contributes to an array of foot and ankle ailments. A common surgical treatment for this condition is a gastrocnemius recession (GR). Many adaptations of the original procedure have been described. Misinterpretations of proper GR procedures have potentially caused confusion when selecting a treatment. This paper proposes to identify errors between the use of GR and gastrocnemius-soleus recession (GSR) procedure techniques in the current literature. A systematic literature review was performed in June 2021, using the PubMed database and select orthopedic texts. Only studies that met the established criteria and either correctly or incorrectly described a GR or GSR procedure were included. After applying exclusion criteria, 108 publications were included. These articles and texts were reviewed for surgical technique and terminology errors in accordance with established parameters. The articles were classified as either: "Correct" or "Incorrect." Of the 108 publications and texts included, 18 articles incorrectly described either a GR or a GSR (16.67%). Ninety articles correctly described either a GR or a GSR (83.33%). The literature supports the use of a GR to treat a gastrocnemius contracture. Inaccurate articles create confusion as to what exactly a GR entails. Sources of ambiguity included terminology, inconsistent anatomical zone definition, and technique selection. Due to this confusion, it is suspected that patient outcomes can be impacted. Postoperative outcomes of GSR patients are worse than GR patients. Further investigation is necessary to determine if performing the incorrect procedure negatively affects patient outcomes.
Keywords: Equinus; Gastrocnemius; Gastrocnemius-soleus; Recession; Silfverskiold.
© 2024 The Authors.