Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are often important for regulating cardiac rate and rhythm. Pacemakers and defibrillators are among the top 10 most-implanted medical devices, with >1.5 million devices implanted annually. While millions of patients have benefited with improved quality of life and survival, CIED-systems are increasingly complex and do not always perform according to expectations. Advisory notices communicate important information about the safety and performance of a medical device to healthcare providers and patients. Medical device recalls are common, with >35 unique device recalls in the past five years. From an ethical standpoint, CIED recalls highlight a range of considerations including the consent process, duty to report, how best to promote autonomous decision-making, trust in the healthcare system, as well as disproportionate impact of these considerations on equity-deserving groups. The purpose of the current article is to review and advise regarding the process around medical device advisory and recall, with a specific focus on clinicians caring for patients affected by these devices. We have sought the input of a lawyer, a patient advocacy group, and an ethicist to guide the clinical management of, and communications regarding, device recalls and advisories. Diligent surveillance and a clear, transparent patient consent process regarding these small but potentially serious device-anomalies is paramount in ensuring patients feel safe and informed. Meaningful patient engagement helps to ensure optimal communication and disclosure mechanisms before implant and throughout follow-up, accessibility of information both in the initial implant and recall action process, and trust in healthcare systems and providers.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.