Sex, age, and species differences of perfluorooctanoic acid modeled by flow- versus permeability-limited physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models

Toxicology. 2024 Apr 18:505:153806. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2024.153806. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate sex, age, and species differences of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in rats and humans. PBPK models were generally developed as either flow- or permeability-limited models. The flow-limited model is cost-effective and allows for human PK prediction through simple allometric scaling, while the permeability-limited model can incorporate detailed information on the disposition process through in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). PFOA was administered via oral or intravenous administration with 5 mg/kg in male and female rats of different ages and the data was used to develop the PBPK models. Our results showed that both models successfully captured sex differences in rats, while only the flow-limited model with male rats and the permeability-limited model with both male and female rats provided comparable predictions in the human clinical study. More than the flow-limited model, the permeability-limited model effectively explained sex differences in rats and species differences through IVIVE. Additionally, the ontogeny-based mechanistic description of PFOA disposition enabled the interpretation of age- and sex-dependent pharmacokinetics. Although the flow-limited PBPK model lacked mechanistic interpretability compared to the permeability-limited model, it demonstrated reliable human prediction through simple allometric scaling. In conclusion, the permeability PBPK model could interpret age, sex, and species differences and it could improve the accuracy of human prediction.

Keywords: Allometric scaling; Human prediction; IVIVE; Ontogeny; PBPK model; PFOA.