There is a need to establish consensus for harmonization in antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (ART) switch treatment strategy and address the dilemma that exists in terms of subpar immune response to therapy or an immunologic deterioration while on therapy. The purpose of this review is to identify the factors that contribute to ARV treatment failure, such as insufficient dosage, drug interactions, poor adherence, drug resistance, and poor medication absorption. It is crucial to adopt a more efficient strategy to address this challenging dilemma. After ARV treatment failure, the aim of therapy is virologic suppression, which targets plasma viral load below the limits of detection as assessed by very sensitive tests with lower limits of quantification of 20 to 75 RNA copies/ml. The therapeutic objectives when complete virologic suppression is not possible, should be to maintain or restore immunologic function, stop the progression of the clinical illness, and minimize the emergence of new drug resistance that could further restrict the options for ARV drugs. Treatment history and drug-resistance testing, including the findings of previous and ongoing resistance tests, should be considered while selecting ARV regimens. Hence, the treatment approach post-ARV failure can be personalized based on clinical, immunologic, virologic, or as a mix of the three domains on a case-to-case basis. The evaluation of projected ARV activity should be based on treatment history and previous resistance test findings.
Keywords: antiretroviral (arv); art switch; arv resistance; hiv aids; virologic suppression.
Copyright © 2024, Sharma et al.