Comparative utility of omnipolar and bipolar electroanatomic mapping methods to detect and localize dual nodal substrate in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Edward T O'Leary; Davis Sneider; Robert Przybylski; Audrey Dionne; Mark E Alexander; Douglas Y Mah; John K Triedman; Elizabeth S DeWitt

doi:10.1007/s10840-024-01800-3

Comparative utility of omnipolar and bipolar electroanatomic mapping methods to detect and localize dual nodal substrate in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01800-3. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Edward T O'Leary^{1

2}, Davis Sneider³, Robert Przybylski^{4

5

6}, Audrey Dionne^{4

5}, Mark E Alexander^{4

5}, Douglas Y Mah^{4

5}, John K Triedman^{4

5}, Elizabeth S DeWitt^{4

5}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. edward.oleary@cardio.chboston.org.
² Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. edward.oleary@cardio.chboston.org.
³ Abbott Cardiovascular, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
⁴ Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
⁵ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
⁶ Division of Cardiology, Inova Children's Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.

PMID: 38634991
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01800-3

Abstract

Background: Catheter-based slow pathway modification (SPM) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is traditionally performed at empiric sites using anatomical landmarks and test ablation feedback within the triangle of Koch (TK). While studies have described more tailored techniques such as bipolar low voltage bridge (LVB) and wavefront collision identification, few have systematically compared the diagnostic yields of each and none have investigated whether omnipolar mapping technology provides incremental benefit. The objective of this study was to compare the utility of omnipolar and bipolar-derived qualitative and quantitative measurements in identifying and localizing dual AVN substrate in patients with versus without AVNRT.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiology study with both omnipolar and bipolar mapping from 2022-2023.

Results: Thirteen AVNRT cases (median age 16.1 years, 512 TK points) were compared to nine non-AVNRT controls (median age 15.7 years, 332 TK points). Among qualitative variables, an omnipolar activation vector pivot, defined as a ≥45 degree change in activation direction within the TK, had the highest positive (81%) and negative predictive values (100%) for identifying AVNRT cases and had a median distance of 1 mm from SPM sites. Among quantitative variables, the optimal discriminatory performance for successful SPM sites was observed using bipolar voltage restricted to a peak frequency >340 Hz (c statistic 0.75).

Conclusions: Omnipolar vector pivot analysis represents an automated, annotation-independent qualitative technique that is sensitive and specific for AVNRT substrate and co-localizes with successful SPM sites. Bipolar voltage quantitatively describes SP anisotropy better than omnipolar voltage, and the addition of peak frequency signal analysis further optimizes the selection of SPM sites.

Keywords: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; Catheter ablation; Electroanatomic mapping; Supraventricular tachycardia.