Body image and pelvic floor dysfunction in pregnancy and postpartum: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study

Laura Cattani; Dominique Van Schoubroeck; Christine De Bruyn; Sophie Ghesquière; Jan Deprest

doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17820

Body image and pelvic floor dysfunction in pregnancy and postpartum: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study

BJOG. 2024 Apr 16. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17820. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Laura Cattani^{1

2}, Dominique Van Schoubroeck^{1

2}, Christine De Bruyn^{2

3}, Sophie Ghesquière⁴, Jan Deprest^{1

2

5}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
² Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
³ Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
⁴ Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
⁵ Research Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.

PMID: 38628037
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17820

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) among pregnant women, their clustering and their association with body image disturbance (BID) up to 1 year postpartum.

Design: Monocentric prospective cohort study.

Setting: University Hospitals Leuven.

Population: Pregnant women attending for pregnancy care, first assessed prior to 14 weeks of gestation and agreeing to follow-up until 1 year postpartum.

Methods: Standardised questionnaires reporting on PFD and BID at 12-14 and 28-32 weeks of gestation, and again at 6-8 weeks and 1 year postpartum. We calculated the prevalence of PFD, how the cases clustered and how the cases correlated with BID using a linear mixed-model analysis. A minimum of 174 women with complete follow-up were required.

Main outcome measures: The questionnaires used were the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF), St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) and the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire (BIDQ).

Results: Out of 208 women, 92.8% reported one or multiple symptoms of PFD at 28-32 weeks of gestation, dropping to 73.6% by 1 year postpartum. The most common symptoms were constipation (65.3% at 28-32 weeks of gestation and 42.8% at 1 year postpartum) and urinary incontinence (56.8% at 28-32 weeks of gestation and 35.1% at 1 year postpartum). After correcting for body mass index, parity and mode of delivery, the severity of BID was associated with the ICIQ-UI SF score (β = 0.016, range 0.007-0.024), the PAC-SYM score (β = 0.006, range 0.002-0.011) and the POPDI score (β = 0.009, range 0.005-0.012), but not with the SMIS score (β = 0.015, range -0.001 to 0.031) or the PISQ-IR score, in sexually active women.

Conclusions: Urinary incontinence, constipation and symptoms of prolapse have a measurable impact on BID.

Keywords: anal incontinence; childbirth; constipation; delivery; faecal incontinence; gestation; urinary incontinence.