Background: Whether PD-L1 testing is needed to identify patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is an area of debate.
Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for phase III randomized clinical trials. We assessed the heterogeneity of overall survival (OS) between patients with high and low PD-L1 expression using an interaction test.
Results: Seventy studies representing 44791 patients were included. Both the CPS and TPS can predict better survival from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with high PD-L1 expression. However, only CPS 1 has the ability to select patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, while an OS advantage can be obtained from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors both in patients with high and low PD-L1 expression defined by CPS 5, CPS 10 and TPS.
Conclusion: CPS 1 is recommended to select patients with the likelihood of benefiting from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors while excluding patients who may not respond.
Keywords: Advanced cancer; Overall survival; PD-1 inhibitor; PD-L1 expression; PD-L1 inhibitor.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.