Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity of fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) to detect retinal laser spots by comparative analysis with other imaging modalities.
Methods: A diode laser with a wavelength of 514 nm was applied with pulse durations of 5.2, 12, 20, and 50 µs. The laser pulse energy was increased so that the visibility of the laser spot by slit-lamp fundus examination (SL) under the irradiator's observation covers from the subvisible to visible range immediately after irradiation. The irradiated areas were then examined by fundus color photography (FC), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (AF), FLIO, and fluorescein angiography (FA). The visibility of a total of over 2200 laser spots was evaluated by two independent researchers, and effective dose (ED) 50 laser pulse energy values were calculated for each imaging modality and compared.
Results: Among examined modalities, FA showed the lowest mean of ED50 energy value and SL the highest, that is, they had the highest and lowest sensitivity to detect retinal pigment epithalium (RPE)-selective laser spots, respectively. FLIO also detected spots significantly more sensitively than SL at most laser pulse durations and was not significantly inferior to FA. AF was also often more sensitive than SL, but the difference was slightly less significant than FLIO.
Conclusion: Considering its high sensitivity in detecting laser spots and previously reported potential of indicating local wound healing and metabolic changes around laser spots, FLIO may be useful as a non-invasive monitoring tool during and after minimally invasive retinal laser treatment.
Keywords: Autofluorescence; Fluorescein angiography; Fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy; Minimally invasive retinal laser treatment; Multimodal imaging; Selective retina therapy; Spot detection.
© 2024. The Author(s).