Comparison of focusing property and radiation force between autofocusing Bessel beams and focused Gaussian beams

Opt Express. 2024 Mar 11;32(6):9982-9994. doi: 10.1364/OE.516084.

Abstract

As abruptly autofocusing beams, autofocusing Bessel beams (ABBs) have been proven to be a class solution for the Helmholtz equation [Opt. Express31, 33228 (2023)10.1364/OE.500383]. In this paper, we use the Fresnel number as the basic parameter and accurately compare the focusing property and radiation force of ABBs versus focused Gaussian beams (FGBs) under the same Fresnel number. Unlike FGBs, ABBs can achieve autofocusing without the need for an initial focusing phase. Our analysis of the beam width defined by power in the bucket, revealed that FGBs exhibit uniform focusing along the straight line, whereas ABBs demonstrate accelerated focusing along the elliptic curve. At the same Fresnel number, FGBs exhibit a higher peak intensity in the focal plane, yet ABBs excel in gradient force on particles. In comparison to FGBs, ABBs exhibit smaller potential well widths, allowing for stable and precise trapping of high refractive index particles at the focal point. While FGBs are considered suitable for laser processing and ablation due to their high peak power density, ABBs possess significant advantages in optical manipulation due to their great gradient force. Furthermore, we conduct a comparative analysis between ABBs and circular Airy beams (CABs). The peak intensity and gradient force exhibited by CABs are slightly lesser than those of ABBs. CABs are appropriate for multi-point trapping along the axis, whereas ABBs are more suited for precise single-point trapping.