Association of Muscle Strength, Psychological Factors, and Central Sensitization With Movement-Evoked Pain in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: The BACKFIT Project

Víctor Segura-Jiménez; Gavriella Tsiarleston; Belén Donoso; Yolanda María Gil-Gutiérrez; Manuel Delgado-Fernández

doi:10.1177/19417381241235152

Association of Muscle Strength, Psychological Factors, and Central Sensitization With Movement-Evoked Pain in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: The BACKFIT Project

Sports Health. 2024 Apr 2:19417381241235152. doi: 10.1177/19417381241235152. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Víctor Segura-Jiménez^{1

2

3

4}, Gavriella Tsiarleston⁵, Belén Donoso⁶, Yolanda María Gil-Gutiérrez², Manuel Delgado-Fernández^{5

7}

Affiliations

¹ UGC Neurotraumatología y Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
² Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. Granada, Granada, Spain.
³ GALENO Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
⁴ Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain.
⁵ Physical Activity for Health Promotion (PA-HELP) Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
⁶ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
⁷ Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Granada, Spain.

PMID: 38566303
DOI: 10.1177/19417381241235152

Abstract

Background: People with chronic pain might evade certain movements to prevent their experience of pain. Movement-evoked pain (MEP) might induce lower functionality during daily activities.

Hypothesis: (1) MEP after physical fitness tests would vary depending on the main musculature involved in the test; (2) physical and psychological factors would be associated with MEP in patients with NSCLBP.

Study design: Cross-sectional design.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: A total of 104 (69 women) patients aged 51.0 ± 10.3 years with NSCLBP participated. MEP was measured with a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and immediately after performing each physical fitness test, that is, the Biering-Sørensen, prone bridging, handgrip, chair-stand, and 8-foot time-up-and-go tests, measuring back extensor, back flexor, upper- and lower-body muscle strength, and motor agility, respectively. Global muscle strength was calculated with normalized index (z-score) procedure. Depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory II, State Trait Anxiety Inventory I, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), respectively.

Results: Patients showed greater pain after completion of the Biering-Sørensen (mean difference 95% CI, 0.02, 1.11), prone bridging (0.15, 1.21), lower pain after handgrip (-1.46, -0.52), and the 8-foot time-up-and-go (-1.43, 0.46) tests (all P ≤ 0.04). Lower global muscular strength (β between -0.18 and -0.30), and greater pain catastrophizing (β = 0.16), and CSI scoring (β between 0.18 and 0.27) were associated with greater MEP (all P ≤ 0.04).

Conclusion: Greater MEP was observed after tests measuring core musculature strength than after tests measuring distal (limbs) strength and agility. Greater MEP was overall associated with lower muscle strength, greater pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization.

Clinical relevance: Fitness testing might be implemented as a complementary tool for the monitoring of NSCLBP in clinical settings.

Keywords: central sensitization; core musculature; muscle endurance; muscle strength; pain severity; physical fitness.